I had put all my eggs in one basket, a clearly unworkable concept, since i assumed, having had only superficial dealings with people, that I could find just one person or party who would have the solution to all my problems.
But I find that life is not so simple, but one has to have a broad view of things, as well as make allowances...
So, this is the 411 on "COUNT1NG NUMB3R5'
There will be first and foremost a lecture, entitled... duh... 'COUNTING NUMBERS" which shows, (to a specific country, for the obvious reason of trying to keep sanity in the schools and minimise disruption of learning), the errors now prevalent in modern mathematics and also why the other stuff from the later scientists will have to be discarded, not least the mathematical basis of the book by Professor G. Brent Dalrymple, The Age Of The Earth, which is what sparked HISTORY to begin with.
After that, I will publish the book COUNT1NG NUMB3R5, publicly, and by its own merits it will then have to open the way for me to get my hands on the ark of Noah so that I can get from the purely theoretical Biblical and Scientific discourse of facts as used in HISTORY 1; COUNT1NG NUMB3R5 to a more practical research, in the follow up.
I hope that this will go a long way in straightening any misunderstandings I may have aroused in the minds of people by not taking heed to the burdens I was placing on them due to my lack of empathy.
The book "COUNT1NG NUMB3RS" will have none of the dry mathematical stuff that is the stuff of classrooms, if it touches on the technical aspects of mathematics it is simply in reference to what is impractical in the assumptions by the physicist Prof. G. Brent Dalrymple, when he stated that the Bible could not be in any way correct chronologically basing that on what he thought was rigorous mathematics, as well as the apparent infallibility of certain "laws" that the natural world obeys, not bearing in mind that everything will, if the conditions are bizzare enough, behave in ways that we would call downright weird, as the first people in space discovered when they left the safety of the atmosphere.
Disclaimer
I am not a Christian, nor am I a believer in God. If He exists, then my conclusion is He is well able to fight His own battles, and does not need anyone to fight them for Him. What I strenuously object to is the assumption by people who are at best described as "armchair scientists/theologians" (people who do not lift themselves off their asses to find out the real truth) stating as authorities, that simply because something appears incredible then it must, perforce be wrong, as if everything that exists is already accounted for by the rational laws that are known.
What would a person who lived in the 1600s say if he/she were to see what is known as normal today, like cellphones and lasers and aeroplanes?
I do what I do simply because it is a worthwhile challenge, and I am bored with the mundanities which any pupil is forced to endure when in fact some of them are based on errors, errors which must be taken as the "Gospel truth" ( I couldn't resist!) if one is to advance academically.
If I tread on the toes of "believers" or other scientists, I offer no apology, since they should have taken the time to scrutinise their "facts" before they so fervently and in many cases zealously espoused them.
Like the character "Cyclops" in the cartoon X-Men I "do not apologise for 'command' decisions", that is, if someone feels hard done by my actions then they only have themself to blame for being in the wrong... which attitude should remove any doubts, if there were any, that I will pull my punches when it comes to exposing the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth... .
So, watch out for the book, "COUNT1NG NUMB3R5", as well as the mathematical work that will be the forerunner of the book. If anyone thought that
2
E = mc
was valid, then I am pleased to say, they backed the wrong horse... .
Always check the facts!!
Never assume, always KNOW!!
